Constitutional Question
A friend e-mailed this link from Michelle Malkin. It's pretty typical of what's out there in the conservative blogs. The photo of the Mexican flag over an inverted U.S. flag flying over a California high school is an image that's getting a lot of attention. And evidently the protesters still haven't realized how this incites anti illegal immigrant sentiment.
He also sent this from an article on NewsMax.
Here in Mexico, where I (legally) reside, the L.A. march was called a "Megamarcha" and was warmly reported in the media.I checked the Mexican constitution here and found the characterization accurate. Here's the relevant Article 33 of the Mexican Constitution. It's clear that Mexico denies to Americans and other foreigners living legally within its borders what it demands America give to illegal Mexican immigrants.
But don't think for a second that Mexico would allow the same sort of nonsense to occur here. Mexico respects her sovereignty too much for that. Even we legal gringos are not allowed to participate in protest marches. In 2002, a number of Americans were immediately expelled for doing just that.
The Mexican Constitution's famous Article 33 gives the Mexican government the right to expel immediately, without right of appeal, any non-Mexican whose presence in the country is "deemed inconvenient."
Chapter IIIWhy do american citizens have to go to alternative media for this information?
Of Foreigners
Article 33 - Foreigners are those who do not possess the qualities determined in Article 30. They have the right to the guarantees of Chapter I of the first title of this Constitution, but the Executive of the Union has the exclusive right to expel from the national territory, immediately and without necessity of judicial proceedings, all foreigners whose stay it judges inconvenient. Foreigners may not, in any manner, involve themselves in the political affairs of the country.







